[RFA-v3] win32-nat.c: Add dll names if debugevents is on
Christopher Faylor
cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org
Tue Jun 17 18:21:00 GMT 2008
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:23:51AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 04:32:06AM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>A Sunday 15 June 2008 23:53:30, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>>> I guess my basic question here is why is this needed at all? Does
>>> the non-windows version of gdb have something similar? If so, this
>>> should be patterned after that. If not, why is Windows special?
>>
>>Well, with set "set verbose 1" you can see dll names being
>>read in already, but you also get a lot more. This is just a
>>couple of lines to add some debug output. Note that it
>>can't be much patterned (without some extra hair) other than
>>printing the so name, because the solib.c doesn't know a
>>thing about each solib's struct lm_info implementation. Then
>>again, I only suggested to add the image base to the output
>>because it was handy... Anyway, I've already spent more time
>>in this thread than it takes to add debug output locally
>>every time I'd need it. It's in Pierre's court to argue. ;-)
>
>Ok. This is the kind of response I was looking for.
>
>I'd like to have as little special case stuff in gdb as possible. We
^
the windows version of
>have been moving in that direction and that's good.
cgf
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list