[RFA] make gdb.base/sigall.c more robust

Doug Evans dje@google.com
Mon Jan 28 23:51:00 GMT 2008


Ping ...

On Jan 17, 2008 3:31 PM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
> One environment in which I run the gdb testsuite has a few signals blocked
> at the start.  If tcl/expect/bash had the ability to unblock signals it might
> be preferable to unblock the signals there (I couldn't find any),
> but OTOH testcases should be reasonably robust.
>
> 2008-01-17  Doug Evans  <dje@google.com>
>
>         * gdb.base/sigall.c (main): Ensure all signals aren't blocked.
>
> Index: sigall.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sigall.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.1.1.2
> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.1.1.2 sigall.c
> --- sigall.c    28 Jun 1999 16:04:02 -0000      1.1.1.2
> +++ sigall.c    17 Jan 2008 23:18:55 -0000
> @@ -1581,6 +1581,18 @@ main ()
>    set_debug_traps ();
>    breakpoint ();
>  #endif
> +
> +#ifdef SIG_SETMASK
> +  /* Ensure all the signals aren't blocked.
> +     The environment in which the testsuite is run may have blocked some
> +     for whatever reason.  */
> +  {
> +    sigset_t newset;
> +    sigemptyset (&newset);
> +    sigprocmask (SIG_SETMASK, &newset, NULL);
> +  }
> +#endif
> +
>    signal (SIGABRT, handle_ABRT);
>  #ifdef SIGHUP
>    signal (SIGHUP, handle_HUP);
>



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list