[RFA] Fix float argument passing in inferior function calls for ppc64
Luis Machado
luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Jan 16 14:45:00 GMT 2008
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 10:48 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 18:54 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 21:48 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>
> > > > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:33:54 -0200
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 15:39 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> > > > > > Is the first word used for anything in the new ABI? If not, you could
> > > > > > support both ABIs by copying the value into both the first and the
> > > > > > second word.
> > > > >
> > > > > Great idea. I will resend the patch using that approach then.
> > > >
> > > > What about this patch?
> > >
> > > Looks fine to me, but I have no means to test it.
> >
> > This is tested in Linux/ppc64.
> > I'll check this version for regressions (I only regtested the previous
> > patch).
>
> No regressions found. Ok to commit?
Maybe adding the testcase and the 32-bit fix as well?
--
Luis Machado
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list