SIGSEGV on gdb 6.7*

Daniel Jacobowitz drow@false.org
Mon Feb 4 21:04:00 GMT 2008


On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:49:48PM +0000, Greg Law wrote:
> yet there appear to be pointers to the regcache squirrelled away in  
> various other places, notably the prologue_cache member of the frame_info 
> structure.

Could you give a specific example?  I don't think there should be such
pointers.

> I guess this might result in some "unnecessary" fetches of the register  
> state, but that has to be favourable to a SEGV :)

Not really - we go to a lot of trouble to avoid this.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list