SIGSEGV on gdb 6.7*
Daniel Jacobowitz
drow@false.org
Mon Feb 4 21:04:00 GMT 2008
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:49:48PM +0000, Greg Law wrote:
> yet there appear to be pointers to the regcache squirrelled away in
> various other places, notably the prologue_cache member of the frame_info
> structure.
Could you give a specific example? I don't think there should be such
pointers.
> I guess this might result in some "unnecessary" fetches of the register
> state, but that has to be favourable to a SEGV :)
Not really - we go to a lot of trouble to avoid this.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list