[RFC] gdb could leave inferior running as a background process

Daniel Jacobowitz drow@false.org
Tue Apr 22 22:09:00 GMT 2008


On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 01:36:01PM -0700, Doug Evans wrote:
> It seems like there are multiple places where this can happen.  E.g.
> wait_for_inferior -> handle_inferior_event -> find_pc_partial_function
> -> target_terminal_ours_for_output.

But by then it's stopped, right?  As long as something makes sure we
give the terminal back after the warning it shouldn't be a problem.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list