[RFC] gdb could leave inferior running as a background process

[Paul Pluzhnikov]

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com> wrote:

>  Would attached patch work better then?

Actually, the second patch doesn't fix the problem by itself:
inferior is resumed, then warning is issued, then we block.

So both the first and second patches are needed.

Thanks,
-- 
Paul Pluzhnikov