[RFC] Using bt command in async mode

[Pedro Alves]

A Thursday 10 April 2008 16:22:36, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
>
> Daniel> Seems like this will be just as awkward in the long term, but
> Daniel> it's an improvement.
>
> Is there some other approach you'd prefer?
>

The approach I though of following would be to
do it explicitly in each command, given that we
may have commands that may apply to another thread
not the current one in non-stop mode, prohibiting those
commands early may be wrong.

Something similar to ERROR_NO_INFERIOR.

I'm not sure we're settled on --thread or not, so
I didn't come forward with this.

-- 
Pedro Alves