Docs and NEWS for breakpoint changes
Vladimir Prus
vladimir@codesourcery.com
Fri Sep 28 06:36:00 GMT 2007
On Friday 28 September 2007 00:49:07 Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> > Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 22:27:34 +0400
> > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> >
> > > > +pending breakpoint that never had its address known,
> > >
> > > I think this is better:
> > >
> > > For a pending address whose address is not yet known,
> > ^^^^^^^
> >
> > Did you mean "breakpoint" instead of first "address"?
>
> Yes, sorry.
>
> > > Example, please. A picture is worth a thousand words.
> >
> > I've added one. Is example with a line as long as 75 characters OK?
>
> @smallexample can handle this (which is why we use it instead of
> @example).
>
> > Thanks for review. I attach the revised version.
>
> It's fine, except for a few small gotchas:
>
> > +It is possible that a breakpoints correspond to several locations
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "a breakpoint corresponds".
>
> > +For a C@t{++} constructor, the gcc compiler generates several
> ^^^
> You forgot to replace with @value{NGCC}.
>
> > +by one row for each breakpoint location. The header row
> ^^
> Still only one space.
>
> > +any shared library is loaded or unloaded. Typically, you would
> ^^
> And here.
Thanks. I've checked in the attached.
- Volodya
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: breakpoint_docs.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 9225 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20070928/04073a44/attachment.bin>
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list