[patch 0/1] Threaded Watchpoints

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:03:26PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> The only problem with moving HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT into the
> target vector might be the remote targets.  Is this information
> available via the remote protocol somehow?  If not, I guess it has
> to stay in gdbarch ...

No, it is not.  We could add it, but of course existing remote stubs
won't tell us which it is.  I guess it depends: are there any targets
where it varies based on how you're connected?

There's room in the world for such a thing: an x86 simulator (like,
say, qemu) might offer steppable or non-steppable watchpoints instead
of continuable ones.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery