[0/9] Breakpoints at multiple locations

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 08:40:13PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> It won't be in general. The address above is basically the last
> address the breakpoint had.  When the library is reloaded, the
> address may change.  I have no opinion whether showing last
> address is good thing, but that's what current version of gdb does.

Right - actually, I think it would be better if GDB forgot about such
addresses when the library is unloaded; that's separate.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery