gdbserver pipe, xml and monitor changes
Chris Johns
chrisj@rtems.org
Tue Nov 6 06:02:00 GMT 2007
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> Take a look at the gdb Wiki; there's a page describing how to run the
> testsuite against a local gdbserver.
Great. This is what I was after. I only have the x86 Linux option to test.
> First of all, do you have a copyright assignment? This is too big to
> take without one. I see something that looks like you in the
> copyright assignment list, but the associated employer disclaimer is
> expired.
That is me. I will contact the FSF and get this updated.
>
> After that's taken care of, I'd really appreciate it if you could
> break this up into a couple of logical pieces. It makes them a lot
> easier to look at. For instance, the register shadow cache is
> independent of everything else.
>
Sure that is no problem.
> The pipe changes are user-visible, so we should update the manual. I
> can take care of that later.
I did notice the documentation and I am fine with getting that in-order.
>
>> The various low level back-ends have not be changed to printf_filtered or
>> warning. Should they ?
>
> Yes, if we document that pipe is available for them.
>
Ok.
Using the pipe mode to run the linux gdbserver resulted in gdb being
suspended. I suspect a signal was passed up. It did not show up with the BDM
back-end because the target is not Unix process. Any ideas where I look ?
Regards
Chris
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list