[rfc / remote protocol] Remote shared library events

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:04:49AM -0700, Jim Blandy wrote:
> Sorry --- of course the @var{r} associated with the dllstop isn't
> meaningless.  Regarding the other pairs, I didn't realize that one
> wanted expedited registers for DLL events; would we actually use them?

Sure.  For instance, if stop-on-solib-events was set, we would stop;
or if we were single-stepping multiple instructions we'd (I hope, I
haven't tested this) keep stepping.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery