[RFC] CHECK_TYPEDEF

Tue Jul 3 01:38:00 GMT 2007

> Do you think the case of a NULL type is at all common?  I bet
> everything that uses CHECK_TYPEDEF then looks inside the type, so if
> we want null type checks, they'd be more useful before the
> CHECK_TYPEDEF than inside it.

Well, I don't think checking for null falls within the definition
of CHECK_TYPEDEF's purpose -- other than that CHECK_TYPEDEF should
not crash.  How about this?

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: check_typedef.txt
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20070703/a5956078/attachment.txt>