[patch RFC] Re: Notes on a frame_unwind_address_in_block problem

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 10:27:51PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> Sorry that I didn't have the time to review this earlier.  This still
> contains the check to catch recursion in frame_unwind_find_by_frame(),
> but that code really shouldn't be necessary now, so I'd prefer it if
> you removed it since it is quite ugly.

Fine by me - I'll just discard the frame-unwind.c part when I commit
it then.  It was only useful during testing but I don't imagine it
will catch much afterwards.  Thanks.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery