Formatting changes to mi-main.c

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 01:20:28PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The above comment is pointless anyway.  And probably misleading,
> because the file probably needs gdbcore.h for things besides
> write_memory by now.
> 
> I encourage people deleting similar comments, and we really shouln't
> add any new comments like that, until something very non-obvious is
> going on.  In that case you'd probably need several sentences anyway
> to explain things.

Completely agreed.  We have occasional non-obvious header includes
(e.g. ordering problems with system headers), but the rest of the time
it should be obvious: it's a GDB header, we want it for the GDB
functionality it contains, and if the file still compiles with it
removed that usually means we don't need it any more :-)

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery