Testsuite failures in gdb.base/callfuncs.exp

Andreas Schwab schwab@suse.de
Thu Feb 1 23:29:00 GMT 2007


Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl> writes:

> No I think there actually is a problem.  Either the bspstore matters
> or it doesn't.  If it doesn't, GDB should just not include it in the
> list of registers it displays.  If it does matter, the test is showing
> a genuine bug.

I don't think a register should be left out just because it is read-only.
It is still part of the processor state and can present information that
may be needed for debugging.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list