PR/2386 [2/2]: MinGW attach to process without an exec file
Sun Dec 30 20:41:00 GMT 2007
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> In many cases they are the same and, when they aren't, there should
> still be a /proc entry for the windows pid associated with the Cygwin
> process, which is what I was saying above.
> For exec'ed stubs you won't see the windows pid entry if you 'ls /proc'
> but it is there if you query it.
Ah, OK. That's surprising. Nice.
> Rather than go back and forth on this, I've taken a stab at implementing
> what I'm trying to get across here. I don't think there is any reason to
> now add Windows 9x support for features that have been missing for years
> so I didn't do that.
I don't know if they were missing from the non FSF MinGW port of gdb,
but I won't go look either.
Sure. What happened was that now if the exec file wasn't found,
gdb would not see the dlls, since now the target_so_ops are
associated with current_gdbarch. That's what the PR is about.
Well, the 1/2 part of the patch also fixes that case, so it's OK.
> I'll check this in unless there are serious objections.
No, not from me. Thanks,
More information about the Gdb-patches