[patch] Basic DW_TAG_interface_type support

[Jan Kratochvil]

On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:51:48 +0100, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
...
> I don't see why you couldn't write one that would work OK on multiple
> architectures; the dw2-basic.S example already includes a type.

OK, some basic DWARF2 info is arch-independent, I see now.

Just sorry recoding it whole mostly by hand is IMO not worth the effort.
No problem if the testcase is not acceptable upstream, I have some doubts it is
useful.


> Anyway, the code patch is OK;

Committed.


Thanks,
Jan