[patch 2/2] Wrap-up expression support for DFP.
Fri Dec 21 16:30:00 GMT 2007
Eli Zaretskii <email@example.com> writes:
>> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 03:49:28 -0200
>> From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> + sprintf (buffer, "%Lf", value_as_double (from));
> If we must live with going through the printed representation, at the
> very least please use "%.30Lf", so as not to lose precision due to the
> default number of significant digits produced under "%Lf", arbitrarily
> chosen by the libc implementation.
Shouldn't that be better "%.30Lg"?
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, email@example.com
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, MaxfeldstraÃe 5, 90409 NÃ¼rnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
More information about the Gdb-patches