[RFC] Support exec tracing on GNU/Linux and HP-UX
Fri Dec 21 16:13:00 GMT 2007
> What do you think of the approach? I'll re-apply your patch on top
> of mine, and see what we get now.
The testsuite results on hpux seem to be a tad unstable (I get
some shakiness in follow-fork/vfork and maint.exp). but I see
the following differences too:
| PASS | | foll-exec.exp: insert first exec catchpoint |
| PASS | | foll-exec.exp: continue to first exec catchpoint |
| FAIL | PASS | foll-exec.exp: sync up after possible failure 2 |
| FAIL | PASS | foll-exec.exp: prepare to jump to execl call |
| FAIL | PASS | foll-exec.exp: jump to execl call |
| FAIL | PASS | foll-exec.exp: prepare to jump to execv call |
| FAIL | PASS | foll-exec.exp: jump to execv call |
On the left hand side, the results before the patch, and on the
right the result after your patch.
So, in terms of results, your patch looks good to me :).
More information about the Gdb-patches