[PATCH] Fix DW_CFA_restore_extended parsing
Fri Dec 21 14:02:00 GMT 2007
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 14:03 -0800, Jim Blandy wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2007 12:22 PM, Luis Machado <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > This simple patch fixes the issue. Any thoughts? Ok to commit?
> The only difference between those two opcodes is in their encoding ---
> the action to be performed is identical. It seems silly to duplicate
> the code. Could you pull the common code out into its own function,
> and then have both cases simply parse their arguments and call the
IBM Linux Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3088 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Gdb-patches