[RFA] Try 3: Use multiple locations for hardware watchpoints.

Daniel Jacobowitz drow@false.org
Sun Dec 16 21:45:00 GMT 2007

On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 02:12:34PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> I've noticed that my previous patch to use multiple locations
> for watchpoint causes (non-deterministic) regression on watchthreads.exp,
> caused by the fact that we always updated the 'val' field on
> watchpoint, and it's possible that if two threads are stopped on
> different watchpoints, we'd update the val field of the second watchpoint
> while processing the hit of the first one, and then when we get to 
> the second watchpoint, we'd decide that the value has not changed.
> I think this revision if really final. OK?

I see I approved the wrong version of this... my comments on the
first version apply to this one too, but other than that it's OK
to commit.

Daniel Jacobowitz

More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list