[RFA] patch for 2384, dangling TYPE_VPTR_BASETYPE
Sat Dec 15 13:15:00 GMT 2007
On Dec 13, 2007 4:29 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 04:10:55PM -0800, Doug Evans wrote:
> > Ok to check in? Or any suggestions for what's needed instead?
> Your patch seems strange to me. Do we need the new fieldno /
> basetype, or not? If we don't, we shouldn't be calculating it at all;
> if we do, there should be something detectable which breaks when you
> do this. It's not just a cache, since the interface doesn't offer any
> other way to return the new fieldno / basetype besides in-place
Hold the fort, I think I see what you're saying now.
I'll send another patch for review.
More information about the Gdb-patches