[RFA] patch for 2384, dangling TYPE_VPTR_BASETYPE

Doug Evans dje@google.com
Fri Dec 14 21:27:00 GMT 2007

One improvement might be to add more comments at the change site
to clarify the situation.   e.g. when fill_in_vptr_fieldno does useful work
and when it doesn't.  [assuming fill_in_vptr_fieldno remains ... it's not
clear to me whether the ultimate fix will remove it]

More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list