[PATCH] PPC atomic single stepping testcase
Tue Dec 4 23:16:00 GMT 2007
Luis Machado wrote:
> +gdb_test "x/g &puts" "$hex <puts>:\[\t\]+$hex" \
> + "Get the address of the puts function"
> +gdb_breakpoint "*(\$__ + 88)" "Breakpoint $decimal at $hex" \
> + "Set the breakpoint at the start of the sequence"
This appears to make quite a lot of assumptions about
glibc implementation details. I'd except just about
any glibc update to break this test ...
As this is a PowerPC-specific case anyway, can you not
use a test that explicitly has the atomic sequence in
the code provided with the test case?
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
More information about the Gdb-patches