[RFA/GPLv3] Add COPYING3 to gdb

Daniel Jacobowitz drow@false.org
Thu Aug 9 11:29:00 GMT 2007


On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 06:06:41AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Sorry, I still don't get it: if those files refer to COPYING and are
> "version 2 or later", then it sounds like having GPL v3 in a file
> named "COPYING" is actually TRT to do, isn't it?
> 
> What am I missing?

That seems basically like changing their license to v3, to me, which
we aren't allowed to do.  But maybe it's within the scope of
redistribution...

There are some files that are going to stay v2 or later (at least for
the moment), like the demangler interface in include/ which is used by
various runtime libraries.  I think it behooves us to keep the GPLv2
while we have files that are covered by it.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list