Signed vs. unsigned adresses in solib-svr4

[Kevin Buettner]

On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:56:07 -0400
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:38:36PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 10:20:23PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > >> > - since I know that the assumption is wrong for MIPS.  Isn't there an
> > >> > extract_address or something like that which would be suitable?
> > >> 
> > >> There is extract_typed_address, but I don't know how to construct the
> > >> struct type that it needs.
> > >
> > > Probably builtin_type_void_data_ptr is all you need.
> > 
> > How about this then?  Regtestest on
> > {i386,ia64,ppc,ppc64,s390,s390x,x86_64}-linux.
> 
> Looks good to me.  Kevin, what do you think?

I like it.

Andreas, please commit this patch.

Thanks,

Kevin