[RFC] h8300 "info registers" fix

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 01:00:17PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
> 
> At Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:04:58 +0900,
> Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> > I modified it in technique to think that I was appropriate.
> 
> OK, much better.  Just one more question.
> 
> Your change to h8300_pseudo_register_read (and write): is it because
> someone is calling the function with a one-byte buffer?  I assume so, 
> but who is making that call?

I'm not familiar with this target, but are there host endianness
problems with this patch?  Casting an unsigned long * pointer to
a gdb_byte * pointer is very suspicious.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery