-stack-list-frames HIGH_FRAME changes

Vladimir Prus ghost@cs.msu.su
Fri Sep 8 06:28:00 GMT 2006


On Friday 08 September 2006 02:35, Nick Roberts wrote:
> > Checked in.
>
> I can't remember that far back but was there any reason for not making the
> same change to -stack-list-arguments?

Other than the fact that KDevelop does not need -stack-list-arguments at the 
moment, so I even did not look at -stack-list-arguments? I think there are no 
other reasons. 

Here we go, OK?

- Volodya

./Changelog:
2006-05-05  Vladimir Prus  <ghost@lvk.cs.msu.su>

        * mi/mi-cmd-stack.c (mi_cmd_stack_list_args): Don't emit error
        if high requested frame number is larger then number of available 
        frames.


doc/ChangeLog
2006-05-05  Vladimir Prus  <ghost@lvk.cs.msu.su>

        * gdb.texinfo (GDB/MI Stack Manipulation): Mention that
        -stack-list-arguments HIGH_FRAME argument can be larger then the
        actual number of frames.


testsuite/ChangeLog

2006-05-05  Vladimir Prus  <ghost@lvk.cs.msu.su>

        * gdb.mi/mi-stack.exp (test_stack_args_listing): Test that
        HIGH_FRAME argument to -stack-list-arguments can be larger than
        the number of frames.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: stack_list_arguments_high_frame.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 2669 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20060908/e98fef82/attachment.bin>


More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list