-stack-list-frames HIGH_FRAME changes
Vladimir Prus
ghost@cs.msu.su
Fri Sep 8 06:28:00 GMT 2006
On Friday 08 September 2006 02:35, Nick Roberts wrote:
> > Checked in.
>
> I can't remember that far back but was there any reason for not making the
> same change to -stack-list-arguments?
Other than the fact that KDevelop does not need -stack-list-arguments at the
moment, so I even did not look at -stack-list-arguments? I think there are no
other reasons.
Here we go, OK?
- Volodya
./Changelog:
2006-05-05 Vladimir Prus <ghost@lvk.cs.msu.su>
* mi/mi-cmd-stack.c (mi_cmd_stack_list_args): Don't emit error
if high requested frame number is larger then number of available
frames.
doc/ChangeLog
2006-05-05 Vladimir Prus <ghost@lvk.cs.msu.su>
* gdb.texinfo (GDB/MI Stack Manipulation): Mention that
-stack-list-arguments HIGH_FRAME argument can be larger then the
actual number of frames.
testsuite/ChangeLog
2006-05-05 Vladimir Prus <ghost@lvk.cs.msu.su>
* gdb.mi/mi-stack.exp (test_stack_args_listing): Test that
HIGH_FRAME argument to -stack-list-arguments can be larger than
the number of frames.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: stack_list_arguments_high_frame.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 2669 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20060908/e98fef82/attachment.bin>
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list