[PATCH] Don't give spurious warnings when using thread specific breakpoints

[Andrew STUBBS]

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> This does make a little sense to me.  Anyone think there's value in keeping
> the note for breakpoints in different threads?

Ok, there seems to be a consensus that the added notes are useful, but 
nobody likes the idea of suppressing the message entirely when the 
breakpoints do not conflict.

How about the attached patch which includes the one without the other? 
I've also taken the opportunity to add _() macros to a few strings.

Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: threadbreak.patch
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20061018/c6d2ee4f/attachment.ksh>