[RFA][3/5] New port: Cell BE SPU (the port itself)

[Ulrich Weigand]

Mark Kettenis wrote:

> >  I've now also tried out yet another alternative approach, which avoids
> >  the ptrace_ops_hack problem by supporting only the spu target again.
> >
> >  It still cleanly separates out target vs. host files.  However, it does
> >  require a change to configure.ac to allow configure.host to specify that
> >  a configuration should be treated as "native" even though host != target.
> >
> >  This patch does work as well as the original one.  Would this (or
> >  something along those lines) also be acceptable?
> 
> This looks fine to me.  Thanks!

I've committed the patch now.  Many thanks for reviewing!

Should I add the port to MAINTAINERS?

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com