[ob] Eliminate another gdb_suppress_entire_file

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 08:35:31PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> Oh ho, I just did a quick grep, and found 352 occurences.
> That's a lot of work... I wonder if we could do that in a mechanical
> way. It seems as though replacing this by an error followed by a return
> would be OK, but not ideal. 

I've been using untested followed by return.  Why wouldn't that be
ideal?

> Hmmm. Perhaps a first step to stop any potential spread would be to
> rename it deprecated_gdb_suppress_entire_file.

Just as much work as changing it, really...

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery