[PATCH] Interpret DW_TAG_unspecified_type as void

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 04:42:31PM -0700, Jim Blandy wrote:
> Yes, this looks fine --- thanks!
> 
> If the change was written by Daniel, and you're merging it on his
> behalf, I think our practice is to use a ChangeLog entry like this:

I don't know if I'd go so far as to say we had a practice... you can
find an example of just about every way of doing this in
gdb/ChangeLog*.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery