MI: fix base members in references

[Vladimir Prus]

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 03:55:42PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> The attached patch fixed the problem, no regression. I'll write a
>> testcase for it as soon as my previous references patch is reviewed -- I
>> don't want to pile too many testcases in as-yet-uncommitted file.
>> 
>> OK?
> 
> OK, with a changelog entry.

Thanks, attached is the version with changelog entry that I've committed.

>> If this patch is fine, can I also commit it to 6.6 branch? The bug in
>> question is quite problematic for C++ code.
> 
> Sounds fine to me, but check with Joel.

I'll check.

After (and if) this patch is merged to branch, and my other references patch
is checked in, I'll adjust the code to just assert, as discussed.

- Volodya

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: base_references_final.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1304 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20061206/4243f17b/attachment.bin>