Variable objects laziness

[Vladimir Prus]

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 12:48:05PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> 
>> >> +     rather value_contents, will take care of this.
>> >> +     It might throw, but unlike var-update for -var-assign
>> >> +     there's just one variable we're working it, so we don't
>> >> +     need to catch the exception here.  */
>> > 
>> > Wait, what?  gdb_value_assign will never throw.  value_contents
>> > might, but gdb_value_assign will catch it.
>> 
>> Yep, confused gdb_value_assign with value_assign.
>> 
>> Updated patch attached. I also attach the delta to the previous patch.
> 
> This version is OK now (for HEAD only).  Thanks for your patience.
> The frozen varobj patch had some further discussion; I'll have to
> get back to it, but I'm afraid not today.  Poke me if I haven't done it
> in a few days, please.

*POKE*.

- Volodya