suggestion for future changes to GDB website

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:10:43 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 11:03:25AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > All the developers who answered were in favor of posting the changes
> > one way or the other. Let's agree on one of the following forms:
> > 
> >   1. Post patch to gdb-patches BEFORE checkin
> >      Not sure how to make things work: Approval needed? Etc.
> > 
> >   2. Post patch to gdb-patches AFTER checkin
> > 
> >   3. Have an automated system that sends the patch with RH to
> >      a mailing-list. Could be a dedicated mailing-list, or one
> >      of the GDB existing mailing lists.
> > 
> > I'm OK with either of the proposals.
> 
> How about just treating it like part of GDB?  Allow global maintainers
> to make or approve changes, and list it in MAINTAINERS.

Yep, that's what I'd suggest as well.  Wed already have procedures in
place for dealing with RFA's, so let's just use them.