[RFC] DW_CFA_restore handling causes memory fault

[Frederic RISS]

On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 23:48 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Sorry to be such a prick, but could you change the message 
[...]
> I think that's less confusing.  With that change you've got my ok.

Well I'm sorry that you have to rewrite my patch yourself :-)

I commited the attached patch containing your message to HEAD. Should
that go to the 6.4 branch also ? BTW, what's the policy for patches
being approved during the release process, do they have implicit
approval for HEAD and the branch or does the latter require explicit
approval ?

> You're not listed in MAINTAINERS though.  Do you've got a copyright
> assignment in place?

I've added myself to the 'Write after approval' section as Jim
requested. My work is covered by the STMicroelectronics copyright
assignment.
 
Fred.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: dwarf2_cfa_restore.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1140 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20051125/f0bd940e/attachment.bin>