[RFC] gdb.base/float.exp and gdb.base/commands.exp patch
Daniel Jacobowitz
drow@false.org
Mon Mar 7 16:58:00 GMT 2005
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 10:39:32AM -0600, Manoj Iyer wrote:
> >
> > Accepting any line number is not OK. Accepting this particular line
> > number does seem plausible. Can you do that instead?
> >
>
> If I change the current value of 57 to 82, the test will pass in powerpc
> but fail on intel. Coz the generated line numbers on intel(57) and
> PowerPC(82) are different.
That's why you should accept both of them.
> > I've done it in the past. It's not that hard to get ahold of one.
> > But, as I said, I do not know what will be output.
> > Might as well do this for now and fix it up later.
> >
>
> So, does that mean you accept the patch to float.exp? Or are we still
> worried about ppc32 nofpu?
I think it's OK. Please post the patch + changelog for just float.exp,
and check that in.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list