typo in gdb/gdb_ptrace.c
Chad Harrington
harrington.chad@gmail.com
Thu Jun 23 05:39:00 GMT 2005
Below is the diff patch for my fix. It is not critical, but it sure
looks like a mistake to me. This was in gdb-6.3, as you can see. The
preprocessor is told to define PT_ATTACH if PTRACE_DETACH is defined.
I think it should only define PT_ATTACH if PTRACE_ATTACH is defined,
but I think they'd both be defined if one or the other is already
defined anyway... It merely appears to be a typo. :-)
I hope this helps.
-=Chad
chad@CRPC02:~$ cat gdb-6.3/gdb.diff
--- old/gdb/gdb_ptrace.h 2005-06-22 23:12:52.000000000 -0600
+++ new/gdb/gdb_ptrace.h 2005-06-22 23:13:57.000000000 -0600
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
/* Not all systems support attaching and detaching. */
#ifndef PT_ATTCH
-# ifdef PTRACE_DETACH
+# ifdef PTRACE_ATTACH
# define PT_ATTACH PTRACE_ATTACH
# endif
#endif
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list