PATCH Makefile.in

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 10:46:35AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> This is an argument for the removal of dejagnu and expect from the
> tree, which I agree with.  It's the one-line change in the test to
> decide which RUNTEST to use that I'm opposing.  I can't imagine such a
> line is too much baggage to carry around.  If you think so, well...  I
> guess I'll just shut up and wait until your next ports require changes
> in dejagnu.

I keep a local copy of dejagnu in my PATH.  I've been doing this for
years (and yes, I do deal with two ports that require changes in
dejagnu).  I find this way much more convenient...

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC