[gdbserver/patch] Z packet support
Daniel Jacobowitz
drow@false.org
Thu Feb 24 20:53:00 GMT 2005
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 01:08:07PM +0100, Orjan Friberg wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> >You missed the most important problem with the previous posting, I'm
> >afraid - it's still whitespace mangled. Please don't send patches
> >using format=flowed; it's very good for text, but lousy for data.
> >Either disable it or just attach them. I've more or less figured out
> >the algorithm by which it ate your patch, but it's pretty tedious to
> >hand-merge; could you resend?
>
> Sure. (Until I figure it out, I'll be attaching patches instead of
> inlining them. Sorry for the trouble.)
>
> >CORE_ADDR is always a long long in gdbserver, so your sizeof (addr)
> >probably doesn't work right for 32-bit targets. I guess sizeof (void
> >*) is always right for this, though... at least for the kinds of
> >targets gdbserver supports now.
>
> FWIW, recurse.exp and watchpoints.exp ran fine on CRISv32 (32-bit target)
> when a 64-bit address was sent. I changed it nonetheless, and tweaked the
> comment.
I was going to implement the matching bits for i386, but never found
the time. No point in my holding up your work any longer. I am still
not clear on how this will handle threads but it sounds like CRIS
kernel bugs mean that that doesn't matter to you; it's irrelevant if
you've only got one copy of the debug registers. I may come back to
revisit the names of the functions if anyone ever implements hardware
breakpoint support.
The patch is OK. Please make sure to include a full changelog entry,
and update the copyright years in any files you touch.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list