[commit] spelling errors in rs6000-tdep.c
Jim Blandy
jimb@red-bean.com
Thu Dec 22 04:56:00 GMT 2005
At the risk of bike-shedding...
The fact that "nonexistent" is in regular use doesn't mean that
"existent" is entirely kosher:
http://www.ling.upenn.edu/courses/ling001/mccord.html
In the 'sz' fields, I think "nonexistent" is right: it's zero when the
registers don't exist.
But in rs6000_gdbarch_init, "extant" is a much better word, having the
connotations of "already".
I've committed the attached.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: jimb.gdb-rs6000-extant-doc-fix.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 986 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20051222/d1f4e0f4/attachment.bin>
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list