[rfa/threads] Eliminate lin-lwp.c
Michael Snyder
msnyder@redhat.com
Fri Sep 17 22:07:00 GMT 2004
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 05:11:27PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>>>I do not think that leaving these functions where they are will
>>>complicate the process of cleaning them up. Could you explain
>>>why you see this as a problem?
>>
>>As with inf-child and inf-ptrace, an important objective here is to get
>>all the inf-linux methods local to a file so that we can ensure that all
>>accesses are strictly via the target vector. Leaving them where they
>>are defeats this, a little.
>
>
> So the reason you want them all in one file is so that you can make
> them all static, and ensure they aren't accessed "on the side". Is
> that right? That's a good technical reason for this patch, one which I
> didn't think of and you didn't explain. I'm just trying to get you to
> share your wisdom with all us other maintainers.
>
> With that explanation presented, I have no objection. Let's make sure
> Michael agrees.
I'm fine with it.
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list