[patch] New test for set backtrace related functionality
Paul Gilliam
pgilliam@us.ibm.com
Mon Nov 8 21:01:00 GMT 2004
Michael,
I'ts been two weeks. Please OK this so I can look good on my review 8-)
-=# Paul #=-
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 11:51, Paul Gilliam wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Here is the latest version of the patch. Sorry I didn't get it turned
> around yesterday.
>
> I make a little chage to your suggested test names:
>
> On Friday 22 October 2004 14:48, Michael Chastain wrote:
> > How about:
> >
> > set test "set backtrace"
> > set test "full backtrace, ignore extra"
> > set test "full backtrace, exact"
> > set test "partial backtrace, with argument"
> > set test "partial backtrace, with limit"
>
> set test "partial backtrace, via argument"
> set test "partial backtrace, via limit"
>
> I think "via" is better here than "with", but "using" would work well also.
>
> I have attached the new files.
>
> -=# Paul #=-
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list