[RFA/RFC] New command: ``start''
Joel Brobecker
brobecker@gnat.com
Tue May 18 19:22:00 GMT 2004
> Okay, this is much more clear now. Perhaps it would be useful to
> mention the term ``startup code'' there?
Sure.
> It's much better, thanks. However, I understand that the same
> arguments will be reused later if the user invokes "run", is that
> true? If so, I think we should mention that.
That's correct. I added a small sentence explaining this. I agree,
I was trying to imply this by saying that we call "run" underneath,
but that's much clearer that way:
Note that the same arguments will be reused if no argument
is provided during subsequent calls to @samp{start} or @samp{run}.
> > +@table @code
> > +@kindex start
>
> I think an additional index entry here saying
>
> @cindex run to main procedure
Added.
> Otherwise, the documentation patch is approved; thanks.
Thanks! Attached is the latest version of the patch.
--
Joel
Attachment:
start_doc.diff
Description: Text document
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list