top-level removal of dejagnu, expect

[Andrew Cagney]

>>>I'm not sure why you think moving to one copy of the FSF dejagnu
>>>> > sources will disturb that.
>>
>>> 
>>> I was concerned about the toplevel build support, not the dejagnu
>>> sources.  The toplevel makefile/configure can deal with dejagnu being
>>> there or not, I see no need to remove such support.
> 
> 
> The obvious reason to remove such support is to reduce the amount of
> stuff to maintain.  If having top-level build support for expect and
> dejagnu is important to Red Hat, can't Red Hat maintain local patches?

If a group need such local changes then it is personally reasonable to 
expect that group to maintain them locally.

Andrew