[patch/rfc] New program_changed event, cleanup some HPUXHPPA mess
Daniel Jacobowitz
drow@false.org
Tue Jun 1 01:40:00 GMT 2004
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 09:30:58PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 03:43:17PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> >>>We'll find out - the change will put the additional lookups will put the
> >>>symtab under extra strain.
> >
> >
> >I have trouble thinking anything will break. Both minimal and full
> >symbol lookups are O(1) already and have been for at least two years.
>
> In that case, since the cache was originally added to work around what
> was a >>O(1) lookup, it should no longer be needed.
>
> Of course, if that isn't the case, we'll find out.
>
> When it comes to fixing the problem, we can extend/tighten the symtab
> interface so that other code can also benefit. That is where the cache
> mechanism belongs - not in hp specific code.
OK, I understand now. Thanks.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list