[RFA]: threaded watchpoint test
Mark Kettenis
kettenis@chello.nl
Thu Jul 29 23:39:00 GMT 2004
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:25:18 -0400
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Sounds good to me. We'll probably want to clean up the other bit about
using the board_info too; or... just recognize that we got a software
watchpoint instead of a hardware one?
Maybe not. It could be a bug to get a software watchpoint when we
expect a hardware one. The question is whether we want to keep a
separate list of "do we expect hardware watchpoints" in the testsuite.
Hmm, I'm getting a bit frustrated that folks keep adding things to the
testsuite that assume features that are not available on most things
not i386 GNU/Linux.
Why do we allow tests like this to be checked in if we know they
produce massive fails on many systems?
Mark
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list