[commit/6.2] Fix lib (C)s; Was: src/gdb/testsuite ChangeLog lib/insight-suppor ...
Daniel Berlin
dberlin@dberlin.org
Tue Jul 20 17:34:00 GMT 2004
On Jul 20, 2004, at 1:18 AM, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
>> So if you consider the license part of the protected work, and thus,
>> changing just the license text to be creating a new derivative work,
>> then you need to update the copyright date.
>> If you don't, you don't need to update the copyright date.
>
> Yeah, I believe that too.
>
> But I think the text quoted (in the URL Andrew cited) is long enough
> to make it worthwhile.
It's not the length of the text that makes it able to be protected (my
dictionary keeps claiming protectable is not a word, so it must be a
lawyer word).
A phone book is very long, but not able to be protected at all (Much to
their chagrin :P).
The text quoted has to meet a set of requirements for originality, etc,
in order to be able to be protected.
I don't believe it does.
>
> Michael C
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list