[RFA]: pending breakpoint support [1/3]

[Jeff Johnston]

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

>On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 05:45:55PM -0500, Jeff Johnston wrote:
>  
>
>>Well, therein lies the problem.  The word "if" might or might not be 
>>part of the symbol.  The
>>regular logic relies on parsing out the symbol first and then looking at 
>>the aftermath.  I don't have
>>that luxury so I punt.  It may be slightly confusing if the user does 
>>the scenario above, but the
>>displayed pending breakpoint info is meant to be the "original 
>>breakpoint string" so I don't anticipate
>>the user will object too much.  Ok or do you have a better idea?
>>    
>>
>
>Right, I see.  This is fine.  The patch is OK to commit with the
>"resolved" wording change - thanks for your patience!
>  
>

Thanks.